Skip to main content
home
news and research
contact
our facebook page linkdin
Friday, February 23 2018
Brisbane population to grow 60,000 a year

Brisbane expected to grow by 1.8 million (60,000 people a year) to 4 miilion over the next 30 years taking it to the size of Melbourne today...

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 05:16 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Thursday, February 22 2018
A good question on Superannuation projections

I received a really good question about my post yesterday on projecting retirement income and whether you would end up on the aged pension. Link to article here if you haven't read.

In the article I had a table showing projected Super balances based on achieving an annual growth rate of 6%.

Based on the example used if you had a Super balance of $200,000 today. You could expect to achieve a balance in 20 years’ time of $641,427.

Invested at 4.5% returns that would give you an annual income of $16,500 a year allowing for the effects of inflation.

The question was that the calculations didn’t allow for Super Contributions over the 20 years.

The chart actually does. It assumes a growth rate inclusive of contributions. Just because contributions are made to Super does not mean a super balance goes up. Super is not like saving unless you are 100% invested in cash. Your balance is not capital protected as many retirees found out during the GFC.

If you refer to the chart above this shows the growth rates of a leading Industry Super Fund (According to their TV Ads supposedly superior funds) over the last 10 years to June 2017. You will notice the fund had some fairly significant periods of negative growth particularly during the GFC and the following aftermath.

At this point people were paying money into their Super but seeing balances decline.

Even in the last few weeks people’s super balances have been declining even though they were making contributions. Because the market has taken a hit.

The other thing to remember is Super also has deductions - tax, fees and insurance.  

The 10-year average return for the above fund was 4.18%.  

I don’t doubt there are funds that have performed better than this but given the share market hasn’t even got back to it’s pre-GFC high I think 6% is being fairly realistic.

But for arguments sake I could make the growth rate 8%. This would only get you to $932,000. Still leaving a shortfall of over $1.7 million.

I’m not here to bag Super. That’s not the point of my article. What I am here to highlight is that for most Australian’s, their Super is not going to be enough. It’s part of the mix but it’s not the complete answer.

My concern is many Australians really don’t understand how way off track they are. Which means if you want to be in a better position you need to have additional strategies in place.

In fact, an interview I heard this morning on the ABC again highlighted this issue. If I can get a transcript or link I’ll get this posted.

Really good question and welcome questions and debate.

If you would like to do something about it then Click here to Book in for a FREE telephone appointment with me and we can talk about the steps you can take to start tackling it.

I look forward to talking with you

Greg Carroll
07 3849 9822
MORE THAN ACCOUNTANTS
JOIN our Facebook Investment Group

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 08:09 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Tuesday, February 20 2018

6 out of 10 Australians believe they will fall short of the amount of money needed to live a comfortable retirement.

Are you one of them? 

These 2 charts below will help you find out.

 

STEP 1 - Work out how much super will you end up with?
 



The above chart estimates your predicted Super balance by the time you retire based on a long term average growth rate of 6%.

For example if you currently had a Super balance of $200,000 and had 20 years until retirement your final Super balance would be $641,427.

So what sort of income would that give you?...Let's go to the second chart

STEP 2 - How much do you need in your retirement fund to earn a certain income?
 

The above chart shows the amount of investment assets less any debt you would need to hold to receive a certain income in retirment based on acheiving a 4.5% return.

The chart also allows for the impact of inflation as $1million today is not going to be worth $1 million in 20 years time.

For example if you wanted an income of $70,000 by the time you retire in 20 years time you would need $2.72 million in investment assets.

How much income do you need in retirement? A general rule of thumb is that to maintain you current lifestyle in retirement you would need an income of approximately 70% of your annual income today. So if you were earning $100,000 today you would need $70,000 in retirement.

In 20 years time if your Super was $641,000 you would earn a measely $16,500 a year.

Which means if you want to earn $70,000 you need to build an extra $2.086 million into your retirment fund over the next 20 years. Or to think of it another way - you need to add $104,000 every year for the next 20 years.

Something tells me salary sacrificing an extra $100 a week into super isn't going to get you there.

I understand most Australians are fearful about investment and taking risk and what could go wrong etc etc but how is doing nothing less of a risk or less scary?
 
You can ignore the problem but it won't go away. And delaying action will only make the problem bigger.

If you would like to do something about it then Click here to Book in for a FREE telephone appointment with me and we can talk about the steps you can take to start tackling it.

I look forward to talking with you

Greg Carroll
07 3849 9822
MORE THAN ACCOUNTANTS
JOIN our Facebook Investment Group

 

 

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 12:35 am   |  Permalink   |  Email
Monday, February 19 2018

If you have concluded that you will have an investment shortfall by the time you retire and that you are going to use property to help bridge that gap. Then your next critical step is to confirm you can get the money to buy an investment property.

There is little point researching property, investigating various suburbs and going to open homes if you don’t know what your purchasing capacity is.

Knowing exactly what your purchasing capacity is going to make it much clearer where you can afford to look and start to narrow down your options.

Which means you will need an understanding of what you can borrow. This might seem obvious but you would be surprised how many people skip this step.

In the current lending environment it would be a mistake to assume you will qualify. In recent times lenders have made some fairly significant changes to lending policy which has had a negative impact on peolpes 

The key factors that will influence your ability to borrow for property are going to be:

  • your current income and expenses – which will determine how much debt you can service, and
  • Your available borrowable equity in property you own and/or deposit funds you have available. Borrowable equity is not the same as the total equity in your home. It is only the amount a lender will allow you to access. This amount will be lower than your total equity.

Importantly it is not sufficient to just have a good surplus income or good equity in your home. You need to tick both boxes to qualify for further lending.

It is essential that you have your borrowing capacity properly assessed by an experienced professional before you go looking for property and certainly before you put a contract on a properly.

By properly assessed I mean a full review of your paperwork – payslips, saving statements, loan statements etc. Using online calculators on lender websites or just handing over some brief details over the phone to a lender is highly unreliable.

If you were pre-approved 3 or more months ago don’t assume that you still have finance. Lenders policies change regularly and have changed significantly in the last 12 months. Also, your circumstances may have changed which may now impact your borrowing capacity.

Need to arrange a finance assessment?

Book in for a FREE telephone appointment with me to arrange a review. Book your FREE appointment now.

I look forward to talking with you



Greg Carroll
07 3849 9822
MORE THAN ACCOUNTANTS
Now followed by over 11,600 subscribers

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 11:10 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Monday, February 19 2018
Should you self manage your investment?

There is a saying in law that a person who chooses to represent themselves has a fool for a client. The same could be said for a landlord who self-manages their investment property.

I’m sure there are some people who do it effectively but from my experience it is a false economy. In trying to save a few dollars in management fees a landlord could be giving up much more resulting in an under-performing property.

There are many reasons why an experienced property manager will achieve a better result for your property than you can

Performance
The first thing to remember is a property manager is paid on performance. The higher the return they achieve for your property the more they get paid. So, they have an incentive to get you the best result.

Keeping it business not personal
Having someone manage your property ensures emotion stays of the decision making. A common quote I hear from self-managers is how they haven’t increased the rent because the tenant has been there long term and really looks after the property. Of course, they are there long term they are paying below market rent – why would they move to something more expensive? And as a tenant they have to look after the property.

The other classic self-management example is renting to friends or family – a major mistake. What are you going to do when they don’t pay rent, damage the property or its time to increase the rent and they cry poor.

A good manager will get you rent increases when the market permits and still keep a tenant on long term.

Market knowledge
They are working in the market day in day out they understand what tenants are looking for, what rental prices are achievable.  

Screening tenants
An experienced property manager will have a structured process to screen tenants which will involve an analysis of their ability to actually afford the rent, reference checks with other property managers, credit checks plus cross checks against their own database. Because they do this for a living they can build up a fairly comprehensive profile on a tenant to assess their quality.

Legal requirements
They will have a thorough understanding your legal rights and obligations in relation to your property including lease documentation, bond, repairs and maintenance, disputes, building and plant and equipment warranties, health and safety compliance, insurance and also the selling of your property if required.

Repairs and maintenance
A good property manager will have a network of tradies that can assist with repairs and maintenance of your property. Because the manager is a regular referrer to these businesses the pricing is generally kept competitive.

Tax deductible
Management fees are tax-deductible so the reality is whatever you have outlaid you will get back the equivalent of your marginal rate at tax time.  

Time
If you are not going to pay someone to manage your property then you have to do all the jobs described above and be fully across all your obligations and responsibilities. Not being compliant for example could void your insurance.

If your property was rented for $400 and your manager charged 8.5% plus GST then you would be paying $37.40 a week. If you had to spend 3 hours a week on average managing your property that's $12.46 an hour.

Surely your time is worth more than that?

It’s possible to achieve good returns and cashflow with investment property without trying to self-manage. Book in for a FREE telephone appointment with me and we can discuss how you could achieve this. Book your FREE appointment now.

I look forward to talking with you


Greg Carroll
07 3849 9822
MORE THAN ACCOUNTANTS
Now followed by over 11,600 subscribers

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 08:09 am   |  Permalink   |  Email
Friday, February 16 2018
Qld post strongest jobs growth of any state

There was a silver lining to Queensland posting the highest unemployment rate in the country...

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 06:36 am   |  Permalink   |  Email
Wednesday, February 14 2018

In addition to saving a deposit or using equity in an existing home you also need to allow for a range of costs when purchasing a property.

When added up these costs can range between 4% to 7% of the purchase price.

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 06:07 am   |  Permalink   |  Email
Saturday, February 10 2018
What can we learn from the sharemarket?

This week’s market volatility provides a good opportunity to reflect on investment attitudes that apply across any investment class including property.

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 07:10 am   |  Permalink   |  Email
Wednesday, February 07 2018
Can Brisbane become a top house price performer?

Brisbane is well placed to take over as the best performing capital city housing market over the next five years.

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 07:06 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Wednesday, February 07 2018
First Home Buyers - Deposit myths and misinformation

The deposit requirements to purchase a property are a common point of confusion for first home buyers. Which is understandable as a lot of information out there is unclear or just plain incorrect.
 

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 02:48 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Monday, February 05 2018
February Property Clock
Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 07:04 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Friday, February 02 2018
Does Queensland's immigration rise point to house price rebound?

Queensland is in a historical sweet spot for home price growth with an analysis of interstate migration showing that the gap in home price between Sydney and Brisbane could soon start narrowing.

In 2002, the median Brisbane home price equated to just 41 per cent of a Sydney home – a historical low. But interstate migration to Queensland started to surge, peaking in 2003 at about 40,000. 

Home prices started to rise as the interstate migration rose and the gap between median Sydney and Brisbane prices started to narrow.

Brisbane home prices were able to reach as much as 78 per cent of a Sydney home price in 2008.

CBRE researcher Ally McDade has analysed the numbers and highlights that the same process is starting to happen again.

​"At June 2017, levels of interstate immigration reached the highest quarterly and annual growth since 2008," she said, "Over the year to June 2017, interstate migration to Queensland increased by an impressive 50 per cent, or circa 17,500 persons."

"As more people migrate to the Sunshine State, the equity wealth built in Sydney is transferred to Brisbane," Ms McDade said. 

"This increase in demand, coupled with a higher perceived value, has historically driven Brisbane real estate prices higher."

Large and small developers in Queensland are noticing the interstate change.

Stockland analysis shows that most interstate buyers to Queensland are coming from NSW, representing about two thirds of total interstate purchases in Stockland's south-east Queensland communities.

Victorian buyers accounted for a further 12 per cent of interstate purchases, followed by South Australia (8 per cent) and the ACT (6 per cent).

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 06:05 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Friday, February 02 2018
Empty apartments a concern for anxious investors

Are the REIQ a bit optimistic

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 05:42 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Thursday, February 01 2018
Inflation weak as you know what

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 0.6 per cent in the December quarter 2017. Certainly no early RBA hike here! was Shane Oliver's immediate tweet.

The CPI rose 1.9 per cent through the year to December quarter 2017 having increased 1.8 per cent through the year to September quarter 2017. Still beow the RBA's target band.

Posted by: Greg Carroll AT 10:29 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Facebook
LinkedIn